Tag Archives: central planning

Security Ideas for Strategic Planning

Was just reading interesting article on protective security measures by Scott Stewart in Stratfor. Turns out there are many similarities to Strategic Planning.

Author was in business of providing protective services to government officials, religious figures, royalty, business executives and ultra luxury individuals.

Professional protective security people certainly understand weapons and self defense. They realize that if they have to rely on these they actually have failed to do their job. True protective service entails anticipating situations and being prepared for them in advance to avoid confrontations. When confrontation is probable, goal is to structure confrontation on terms the protective service experts dictate.

Action is always faster than reaction. Just watch a football game. Proactive approaches involve “excellent situational awareness, thorough logistics planning, good security assessments, careful trip and individual site security advances, liaisons with counterparts and strict operational security. Protection teams can also employ powerful tools such as protective intelligence investigations, threat and psychological assessments of people with an unusual interest in the protectee, and countersurveillance detection teams.”

Leaders use the same approach when doing their strategic planning, whether it’s to address an emergency or a surprise in business, or to do the annual strategic plan, or long term plan based on business outlooks years out.

It’s already June, are you hitting your strategic plan for first half of year? What adjustments are necessary for second half of 2016? What are your plans for 2017 if economy holds strong? Starts to soften? Either nationally or just in your market or,selective market segments?

What’s Important to You?

World is in different place than ever before. That’s true with every generation over the history of time. Ah, but do you know what pitfalls are this time? Have you taken steps to minimize effect of disasters, natural or government induced?

What’s different this time?   Most countries are broke.

So what are most countries doing? And why do you care?

They are relying on printing presses creating a rapidly expanding money supply.  Historically this has happened to many countries at one time or another. We all know the boom bust times in various South American countries.

This time it’s happening at the same time to most industrialized countries at the same time. Think China, Japan, Great Britain, US, India, almost all of Europe and Africa. Governments are increasingly tied to each other in the ways they exchange money and honor currencies.

Japan and China own trillions of the US debt. Countries have huge amounts of actual US dollars. That means re-pegging the value of US dollar won’t work. In past we were tied to gold standard. That would no work in US this time around. Countries that hold trillions of dollars outside the US could still sell the currency for any amount they wanted and US could not stop it.

Back in 2009 US public and private dept was in neighborhood of $55 trillion. That debt had significant impact on US economy. Today, US public and private debt has climbed to $65 trillion. Total US debt is up 150% since 2000. Additionally rest of world has added another $57 trillion in public and private debt.

This is referred to as “hot money” lending. But does it matter? McKinsey points out that debt, around the world, is outpacing economic growth. When economic growth can’t finance all these loans, only governments are willing to step into the breach.

This debt can only be paid off in 3 ways:

-Paid off by the people, businesses, and countries that took on the debt.
-Inflation
-Declaring the debt null and void…destroying relationships with those who provided the money in the first place. This has been used by many countries over the history of the world…but never by a number of countries in a very short period of time. No one knows the effect if several countries started down this path.

Federal Reserve Richmond, VA branch recently reported that 61% of all liabilities in US are now guaranteed by the government, implicitly or explicitly. In 1999 the percentage was 45% (mostly Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). Today more and more of our financial institutions rely on the government to access credit.

Unfortunately, government guarantees are not shown on any government balance sheet…in US or elsewhere in the world. Governments are relying on massive currency and interest rate manipulation to fund themselves. World has never experienced anything like this by the major economic powers of the world.

Sooner or later this bubble will pop, like many others have over the years. But when?

Nobody knows. But what it means for your personal wealth is known. The biggest threat to your wealth isn’t a stock market crash. Instead it’s from confiscation and/or devaluation by our government. Think Greece last year that took 25% of savings from citizens bank accounts.

In the 1930’s people and companies suffered massive losses. But the actual wealth didn’t disappear. Wealth transferred from creditors to lenders. This time around we will have the above, but will also have major collapse in governments politically. The US government has pledged a large amount of the wealth of the citizens to other people…through all kinds of government programs. We are all familiar with Detroit bankruptcy. That will occur within America and many other countries…within a few years.  What’s a few years? Again, no one knows for sure, but within 10-20 years seems realistic.

Once inflation takes off it can have devastating effects quickly. Think back to the Carter years when inflation in US hit 20%.

US, and most countries of the world can’t sustain government spending that is vastly outstripping tax revenues coming in. Sooner or later the piper has to be paid.

Previously the world would have a 1930’s situation where loans would be called. Difference then and now? Governments were not the primary financiers of the world debt.  Banks and financial institutions had the primary role.  If government can’t pay all the people that have been promised money there will be riots on massive scale.

So what can individuals do?

10,000 doctors every year are refusing to serve Medicare patients. That means many people won’t be able to get doctors appointments. What you can do? Doctors, not participating in Medicare are starting to charge patients monthly fee to see them. In effect doctors are signing up the patients they want to see to give doctors the income they want. These patients at least are assured medical opinions will be available to them. Start understanding medical coverage options in other countries…like Costa Rica or Panama (there are lots of others.) Those two countries have doctors that were educated in US and majority speak English. Last those countries are just few hours away and charge fraction of US doctors and hospitals.

Above is only one example. Many people have majority of their wealth tied up in value of their homes. What happens in major downturn when housing prices drop? In 2009 housing values dropped by over 50% in some markets. For most Americans that means there houses are worth far less than they paid. What can you do? Work to eliminate as much debt as possible, especially credit card debt and auto loans. If you can, pay off your house…or go to 15 year mortgage. Objective is to reduce debt so you can cover any remaining debt in a down turn.

Wages have remained flat in US for many years. How many? Depends whose figures you want to use. Assuredly since at least late 1990’s. Differences in years typically depends on rate of inflation that is applied.

To minimize this, acquire the things you need if times get tough. For some that’s food storage, for others it’s cash, or other products and supplies that are important to them.  If there’s run at supermarkets toilet paper becomes pretty valuable. Natural disasters have cleared the shelves of supermarkets many times. The economy doesn’t have to tank to cause major disruptions. People who have taken, even just a few steps, to prepare for emergencies that would affect them sleep better.

Most people live day-to-day. They assume things won’t happen. They listen and believe the media. Remember, no government cares much about their citizens. We are each just a number. Any of us that think differently aren’t thinking.

Ending Federal Deficit-Buffet’s Solution

Warren Buffet recently had excellent quote about the debt ceiling during an interview on CNBC:

“I could end the deficit in five minutes. You just pass a law that says that anytime there is a deficit of more than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for re-election.”

U.S. Dollar Is Gaining Like It’s the 1980s. Is That Good or Bad?

Read interesting article on Bloomberg over the weekend, written by Chikako Mogi and Shigeki Nozawa.

We know the dollar is strong, but the global financial markets are lacking a cohesive direction.

1985 US Treasury Secretary Jim Baker introduced the Plaza Accord. By persuading Japan, Germany, France and UK to join in a coordinated plan to weaken the dollar. The dollar was to strong, which adversely affected US exports.

Then and Now

In 1980’s US had the leadership and strength of purpose to develop the Plaza Accord which benefited the US and the rest of the world. Today, while the Fed is in a position to raise rates, it is hesitant to do so. Makoto Utsumi was minister at Japanese embassy at time of Plaza Accord (and now chairman of global advisory board for Tokai Tokyo Financial Holdings Inc.) Today, “The common understanding for the need for policy cooperation shared at the Plaza Accord is lost and it’s not clear where the true leadership is in each country or in the world.”

International Monetary Fund reports that global imbalances were hindering global growth. There is a Group of 20 foreign countries which meets to address slowing Chinese economy. Their meeting ended without any concrete policy on how to proceed. There is serious lack of coordination or agreement on how to proceed to avoid an economic disruption.

Why? The Plaza Accord came about because of long established relationships between treasury officials of various countries. Those relationships take years to develop and don’t exist in the world today.

It’s understandable that the G-20 meetings lack agreed upon decisions. Getting 20 countries headed in the same economic direction is like herding cats. There are just to many countries involved to expect agreement.

That leaves it up to the G-7 countries. This group of countries  has worked together in the past to return currency markets to an orderly balance. But it is expecting a lot that the G-7 countries can accomplish what they did in the past. 30 years ago they controlled 50% of world’s GDP. Today they only control 34%.

So What Should We Expect?

-The Fed to keep interest rates low longer than expected. That does not mean the Fed won’t raise rates within next few months…but it is unlikely Fed will raise rates much. Fed goal is to protect US economy.

-Unfortunately, there does not appear to be the leadership necessary to coordinate a world wide economic policy that can benefit majority.

-That means, in the US, we can expect the stock market to continue the current trend of ups and downs.

-Fed in the past had plan and policy telegraphed well in advance. That enable companies and countries to plan 2-3 years ahead…instead of current 2-3 months.

Most important take away for all of us?

Two points

-In all things people, companies, and countries, need to be looking ahead 2-3 years.  We all need to be evaluating short-term in relation to longer term plans, except in dire emergencies.  Is it hard to do? Not really. Only question is if we are disciplined enough.

-The importance of establishing  long term relationships. Personally and in business.

 

Here is link to entire article on Bloomberg. .

Theodore Roosevelt’s Ideas on Immigration

Theodore Roosevelt’s ideas on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN in 1907.

‘In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag… We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language.. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.’
Theodore Roosevelt 1907

Recent article on immigration on LinkedIn got me thinking about  immigration issues around the world. Immigrants trying to force their way into Europe, but not anywhere in Europe, to the countries with the best jobs. Syrians and other immigrants from Africa just trying to get out. Closer to home,  illegal immigrants coming across from Mexico, many with criminal past or criminal intents. Many from  other countries that are just using Mexico as a conduit into US.

Countries are trying a “one size fits all” approach to immigration. It’s not working.
Appears there are 3 immigrant issues:

-Those desperate to save their own lives and lives of their children from despots. These people, for most part, would take any jobs, and probably do anything to assimilate into the country they go to. These groups are from all walks of life, uneducated and unskilled to highly educated and highly skilled.

-Very selfish immigrants looking to improve their lives who demand that country they immigrate to meet their demands and adapt to their cultures. They don’t expect or want to learn language of their host country, may not want to adapt their religious practices to the customs of their host country, and some want to bring their own legal system with them instead of adapting to their host country.

-Immigrants looking for hand outs from country they move to. Without any real interest in the country they are immigrating to and without any intent of adapting to assimilate.

Foreign governments also are taking three approaches

-There are despotic governments that are just trying to eliminate certain ethnic types to “purify” their country. For political and/or religious grounds.

-Countries where the government simply can’t function well enough to take care of all the population. Some are well meaning. Most of these countries, are just struggling to stay in power and are spending lot of their economic resources trying to “keep the lid on” internal uprisings.

-Still other governments are interested in exporting the criminal element in their societies. Or exporting terrorism.

Countries facing a large influx of immigrants need 3 approaches as well. One immigration policy doesn’t fit all situations.

-Immigrants fleeing for their lives need to be assimilated. Those immigrants also need to be carefully screened to assure they are not criminals in their own countries or terrorists or religious extremists unwilling to adapt to host country. These immigrants must be willing to learn the language of their host country, agree to follow the host countries laws, and agree to take the jobs that are suitable for them. They need to be disbursed within a country, that means they can’t form mini cultures within their host country. That also means the host countries have to work hard to enable the people to assimilate as painlessly as possible.

-Immigrants looking for free ride, or to impose their culture in their host country need to be deported back to their country of origin. That means countries need to adopt standards that let them deport people for up to several years. Most immigrants are smart enough to tell host country anything the host country wants to hear, to get in. Agenda of these immigrants may not surface for months or years. When those agendas come out the immigrants must be dealt with.

-Immigrants that foment unrest in their host countries need to be dealt with very harshly. At very least they need to be deported and not allowed to visit the host country…ever again. If, after deportation, they sneak back in, they need to be dealt with using strong corporal punishment. They have already demonstrated their country of origin can’t keep them in. They have already demonstrated they don’t care about their host country.

No country is rich enough to accept all immigrants who want to come.

Each country needs to come to grips with this. As rich as world thinks US is, we can’t assimilate millions of immigrants who don’t speak English, when majority lack education or skills to perform jobs we need done. Majority of immigrants need at least a few years to adapt to their host country. Countries of the world, including US, don’t have the financial reserves to accommodate all the people who want to immigrate. Most countries are already facing financial difficulties taking care of their own citizens who need help. Each country has an obligation to take care of their own citizens before helping others.That’s harsh, but it is an economic fact of life.

Politicians of the world, wake up. The world is way to complex. Countries can no longer afford “one size fits all” policies.

 

 

This ‘N That 4/24/14

Central Planning Always Fails in the End-Now it’s Yellen’s turn to learn.
Ms. Yellen is strong proponent of central planning. Shortcoming is not using practical rules. She prefers economic models with names like “optimal control” or “communications policy.”  To Yellen, ‘optimal control” equates to abandoning current conditions and substituting a policy to keep rates lower longer. She believes that by communicating the Fed’s intentions individuals will “get the message,” making decisions on investments, spending, and borrowing based on promises of lower rates. That in turn will lead to increased demand, strong economic growth and higher employment. When that occurs the Fed can start to withdraw support so inflation doesn’t occur.

That’s her theory. How about reality? The Fed is trying to change consumer psychology. The trouble occurs if it succeeds. Once consumers change philosophy it’s very hard to get them to change back. Kind of like putting the tooth paste back into the tube. The Fed would like inflation at 3% or so. Fed believes they can control it. But like all central planning that rarely happens.
***********
We live in a bi-polar world. There are practical solutions. This is longer than practical here. Published on SecurEmploy Blog 4/12/14 Just scroll down.
***********
It’s All a Matter of Perspective. We are all aware of self-serving nature that fill politicians minds, and how dysfunctional our government is. But the larger picture is pretty good and we each need to remind the pessimists of the world how good we have it. We have a stable “democracy.” A military power that is the primary defender of the free world. Our economy is still the largest. Our dollar is still involved in 87% of currency transactions. Our financial markets are the freest. Our free enterprise system is still envied. Our economy is expanding. Unemployment just hit a 5 year low. New technologies are driving additional and new manufacturing.
**********
71% of US workers actively looking or open to new opportunities. If 71% are looking for new jobs how come we are making recruiting employees so difficult? Only two things are needed for successful recruitment. First, make sure recruiters are spinning the dial…calling prospects, calling peers in position to ask for leads, etc. Second, Require every manager in your organization to refer at least 4 “A” candidates to your company every year. What’s an “A” candidate? The types of employees you need the most. Recruiting should be the responsibility of the managers who have the direct responsibility for the function. Remember: Every new employee should make a contribution to profits = to at least 5 times their salary the first 12 months on the job. Sales people 10x.
**********
Degenerate Capitalism. What’s implication for our industry? Three thoughts. This one is little longer than fits here. Published on SecurEmploy blog April 23. Just scroll down.
**********
Foreign Investment. Last year, foreigners invested a record $38.7 billion in commercial property, according to real estate brokerage Jones Lang LaSalle. That’s a 44% increase from 2012.

Ask Employees to Tell Their Friends About Your Job Openings We all know the value of employee referrals. Have you asked your employees to tell friends and family about your openings? Or do you just assume they do that? Expand your network of referrals. Be sure to offer an incentive for any referral hired.
**********
French social commenter and political thinker Montesquieu once wrote, “There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of law and in the name of justice.”
**********
Why is Russia really interested in Ukraine? Why doesn’t US have a dog in this fight. SecurEmploy blog post 4/21. Just scroll down.
**********
Crimea is resource rich. Rest of Ukraine is resource poor. Crimean resources are very important to Russia. Without Crimea, Ukraine can not continue to exist. Russia can threaten and bluster but starve Ukraine into submission. Inflation in Ukraine is already at 25%. Russia is Ukraine’s largest trading partner making up 70% of Ukraine’s exports. Take away Crimean commodities and Ukraine doesn’t have enough to export to survive.
**********
From Chicago: “In Chicago, armed civilians justifiably killed three times as many violent criminals in past 5 years as did the police.’”Civilians defending themselves captured, wounded, killed or scared off criminals in 75% of confrontations.” Professor Don B Kates Jr, St Louis University law professor, Laissez Faire Today.
**********
China’s trade agreements to use Yuan to replace $. Good or bad?

Already, China has trade agreements with Brazil, Australia, the European Union, and other nations. Most international trade is conducted in dollars

Last year, the yuan surpassed the euro as the second-most-used currency in the world… It made up 8.7% of global trade in October 2013 compared with 6.6% for the euro. In 2012, the yuan only made up 1.9% of trade compared with the euro’s 7.9%.

If the world rejects the dollar in favor of the yuan – or any other standard for trade – it would end US ability to print a limitless number of dollars and issue limitless amounts of debt

OR WOULD IT?American public seems to have no ability to stop government printing presses. Politicians certainly have no reason to stop the presses. Perhaps the only thing that will get US to address our issues is by losing the Dollars position as world currency of choice.
**********
Two numbers the government can’t fudge. Employment-to-population (currently just under 59%) and Participation Rate the actual percentage of the population, of working age, that is working (currently 63%, down from a high of 67% in 2000). US had 118.5 million full time and 26 million part time workers in 2013. That means that 37.5% of residents are working to support the other 62.5%. That’s not sustainable. Only part of that 62.5% are children.
**********
Current Career Opportunities Corporate, Hotel, and Resort opportunities.

Training for Revenue Generation by Ed Iannarella.

 

Central Planning Always Fails in the End

Central Planning Always Fails in the End-Now it’s Yellen’s turn to learn.

Ms. Yellen is strong proponent of central planning. Shortcoming is not using practical rules. She prefers economic models and then likes names like “optimal control” or “communications policy.”  To Yellen, ‘optimal control” equates to abandoning current conditions and substituting a policy to keep rates lower longer. She believes that by communicating the Fed’s intentions individuals will “get the message,” making decisions on investments, spending, and borrowing based on promises of lower rates. That in turn will lead to increased demand, strong economic growth and higher employment. When that occurs the Fed can start to withdraw support so inflation doesn’t occur.

That’s her theory. How about reality? The Fed is trying to change consumer psychology. The trouble occurs if it succeeds. Once consumers change philosophy it’s very hard to get them to change back. Kind of like putting the tooth paste back into the tube. The Fed would like inflation at 3% or so. Changing psychology could mean inflation quickly jumps much more than that. The Fed believes they can control it. But like all central planning that rarely happens.